Jumat, 09 November 2012

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN FRANCHISE BUSINESS



Franchise business has grown rapidly in Indonesia over the last two decades. Following the entering into Indonesia of Kentucky Fried Chicken –the well known American fast food business– in the late 1970s, many franchise businesses have since the late 1980s been established and well developed in Indonesia. Local franchise businesses have since 1990s been inspired for running and developing businesses accross cities in Indonesia.

The emerging and spreading of franchise businesses in Indonesia have finally caught the attention of the Government to formally regulate franchise establishment. It is only in 1997 that the Government of Indonesia issued a Government Regulation regulating the setting up of franchise business, with detailed regulation stipulated under a Decree of Minister of Trade and Industry.

Positive development of the franchise businesses along with many inputs of law practicioners and entrepreneurs have contributed to the issuance of the latest Government Regulation No. 42 in 2007 regulating the setting up of franchise business, replacing the former government regulation. Thus the detailed regulation was also replaced, the latest one is the Minister of Trade Regulation No. 31 of 2008 on Undertaking Franchise Business.

It is under the latest Minister of Trade Regulation No. 31 of 2008 that intellectual property rights related to the franchised business are required to have been registered. Registered intellectual property rights are one of the criteria of franchise system. The former regulations did not put registration as a requirement. They only required the franchisor to mention in the franchise agreement the intellectual property rights of the franchised business.

To run franchise business in Indonesia, any intellectual property rights of the franchised business must be registered with the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights. As generally people will first recognize the business through its trademark and/or logo, obviously trademark and logo are the ultimate symbol of a franchised business. Therefore, registration of trademark and logo of the business is a must. This is to protect the interests of both the franchisor and the franchisee against any claim of a third party for the right to use and to enjoy the benefit of the trademark and logo in concern. Further, trademark and logo of the franchisor’s company carrying out the franchised business must also be registered. Whilst the company’s trademark and logo are commonly different from the trademark and logo of the franchised business, ignorance in registering the company’s trademark and logo will cause serious harm to the business.

Other types of intellectual property rights may also relate to a franchised business and accordingly must also be registered. If a franchised business involves an invention or a new technical method, the invention or the new technical method must be registered as a patent right. An ice cream company producing ice cream with the shape of small balls using the company’s new technical method for making the freely movable ice balls must register such new technical method as a patent right. However if it turns out that the same method has already been registered by another party, then unless the ice cream company holds license to use such registered method, it may not use the method to commercially produce the ice cream balls.

If a franchised business involves products with a new three dimensional commercial design, the commercial design must be registered as an industrial design right. Ice cream produced with the shape of small balls is one of an example of three dimensional commercial design that can be registered as an industrial design right. Failure to first register the industrial design of the ice cream balls three dimensional design, although this ice cream ball company is the first one commercially producing ice cream balls, could cause another party conducts the registration for their interest and then threatens the ice cream ball company to not produce ice cream balls. Should the ice cream ball business has been franchised, such threat will interfere with or even interrupt the product supply which, at the end, could affect the franchised business.

The franchisor shall be the one responsible for the registration. Although the Minister of Trade Regulation is silent about whose name the intellectual property rights should be registered under, it is strongly recommended that the intellectual property rights are registered under the name of the franchisor. Having any intellectual property rights registered under the name of a party other than the franchisor will most likely result in a legal dispute which will eventually harm the continuity of the franchised business.

For a franchised business entering Indonesia, although the intellectual property rights have been registered in the home country and, perhaps, in many countries other than Indonesia, they still have to be registered in Indonesia for legality to use in Indonesia and for both the franchisor and the franchisee protection against third party claiming the right to use and enjoy the benefit of the relevant intellectual property rights.



 
Said, Sudiro & Partners
Indonesian Attorneys at Law
Sampoerna Strategic Square
South Tower, Level 18
Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav. 45 - 46
Jakarta 12930 Indonesia
Phone: (62-21) 575.0983
Fax: (62-21) 575.0803
Websites: www.ssplegal.com
                www.saidsudiro.webs.com
                www.saidsudiro.weebly.com
P.O. BOX 8211 JKS.SB Jakarta 12920www.ssplegal.com

Minggu, 04 Oktober 2009

Requirement of Minimum Period for Providing a Draft Franchise Agreement

One of the new requirements to be observed by any prospective Franchisor and prospective Franchisee is the minimum period that a draft franchise agreement shall be provided before such draft agreement could be signed, as stipulated in the Regulation of the Minister of Trade No. 31 Year 2008 concerning the Organization of Franchise.
Pursuant to Article 5 paragraph (3) of this Ministerial Regulation No. 31, a draft franchise agreement must be provided to a prospective Franchisee at least 2 (two) weeks before the target date of signing the agreement.

With the requirement of minimum period for providing a draft franchise agreement, a Franchisor could be more attentive in the process of preparation of a draft franchise agreement. A draft franchise agreement should not be standardized for any prospective Franchisee. Preparation of each draft franchise agreement requires careful thought and consideration, taking into account the proposed place of the franchise business, term of the agreement, rights that the Franchisee would enjoy under the agreement, obligations to be fulfilled by the Franchisee, and other factors that may affect the course of the franchise business .

Likewise, the requirement of minimum period for providing a draft franchise agreement under this Ministerial Regulation No. 31 shall mean a positive support to a prospective Franchisee. With this minimum period requirement, a prospective Franchisee would have sufficient time and opportunity to analyze the prospect of the concerned franchise business, discuss and negotiate with the Franchisor, so any potential disputes might be mitigated.



Said, Sudiro & PartnersIndonesian Legal Consultants
Sampoerna Strategic Square
South Tower, Level 18
Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav. 45 - 46
Jakarta 12930 Indonesia
Phone: (62-21) 575.0983
Fax: (62-21) 575.0803

Websites: www.ssplegal.com
                www.saidsudiro.webs.com
                www.saidsudiro.weebly.com

Emails: mail@ssplegal.com
               sdsdp@cbn.net.id

P.O. BOX 8211 JKS.SB
Jakarta 12920

IPR under the Ministerial Regulation 31/2008

In August 2008, the Indonesian government has issued a Ministerial Regulation No. 31 Year 2008 on the Undertaking of Franchise. This Ministerial Regulation is intended to replace the previous Ministerial Regulation, the Ministerial Regulation No. 12 of 2006.

Ministerial Regulation No. 31 prescribes several points that have not been previously regulated, among others on the registration of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) such as logos, marks, industrial designs and patents.

Pursuant to Article 2 paragraph (1) jo. Article 5 paragraph (1) of the Ministerial Regulation No. 31, a Franchise Agreement shall at the minimum contain several points including Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) that have been registered. In this regards the government requires that any IPR related to the franchise business in concern must first be registered with the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights. Evidence of registration of the IPR shall be attached to the Franchise Agreement.

How if a Franchise Agreement has not attached any evidence of registration of the IPR related to the business being franchised?

Registration of the IPR related to the business being franchised can be carried out at the Directorate General of IPR through experienced consultants, in accordance with the IPR classification and the business activities. Experiences and strategies in the registration of IPR are a must in order to mitigate any potential problems that may harm either the Franchisee or the Franchisor in future.

Some adjustment in the Franchise Agreement to attach evidence of registration of the IPR should meet the conditions required under the Ministerial Regulation No. 31.



Said, Sudiro & PartnersIndonesian Legal Consultants
Sampoerna Strategic Square
South Tower, Level 18
Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav. 45 - 46
Jakarta 12930 Indonesia
Phone: (62-21) 575.0983
Fax: (62-21) 575.0803

Websites: www.ssplegal.com
                www.saidsudiro.webs.com
                www.saidsudiro.weebly.com

Emails: mail@ssplegal.com
               sdsdp@cbn.net.id

P.O. BOX 8211 JKS.SB
Jakarta 12920

Equal Legal Position for Franchisor and Franchisee

Regulation of the Minister of Trade No. 31 Year 2008 concerning Organization of Franchise as the implementing regulation of the Government Regulation No. 42 Year 2007 concerning Franchise explicitly stipulates that a Franchisor and a Franchisee both have an equal position under a franchise agreement. This provision should have a positive impact to the continuity of a franchisee business as it provides legal certainty.

With an equal position among a Franchisor and a Franchisee, then each party may request performance by the other party of the obligations in accordance with the agreement. Incorporation in the agreement of the rights and obligations of each party can be used as a reference or ground for a Franchisor or a Franchisee to proceed with legal action when any of the parties violates the agreement. Therefore, it is expected that both Franchisor and Franchisee will put their efforts to comply with the agreed terms and conditions under franchise agreement so franchise businesses can be maintained and developed well, and further they could stimulate the growth of national economy.



Said, Sudiro & Partners
Indonesian Legal Consultants
Sampoerna Strategic Square
South Tower, Level 18
Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav. 45 - 46
Jakarta 12930 Indonesia
Phone: (62-21) 575.0983
Fax: (62-21) 575.0803

Websites: www.ssplegal.com
                www.saidsudiro.webs.com
                www.saidsudiro.weebly.com

Emails: mail@ssplegal.com
               sdsdp@cbn.net.id

P.O. BOX 8211 JKS.SB
Jakarta 12920

Selasa, 09 Desember 2008

www.saidsudiro.weebly.com



-->
Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan No. 31 Tahun 2008 tentang Penyelenggaraan Waralaba yang merupakan peraturan pelaksana dari Peraturan Pemerintah No. 42 Tahun 2007 tentang Waralaba secara tegas menyatakan bahwa Pemberi Waralaba dan Penerima Waralaba mempunyai kedudukan hukum yang setara dalam suatu perjanjian waralaba. Ketentuan ini tentu berdampak positif bagi kelangsungan usaha waralaba dikarenakan adanya kepastian hukum yang dengan tegas menyatakan demikian.

Dengan kedudukan setara diantara Pemberi Waralaba dan Penerima Waralaba, maka setiap pihak dapat meminta dilaksanakannya kewajiban pihak lainnya sesuai perjanjian. Pencantuman hak dan kewajiban masing-masing pihak dalam perjanjian waralaba dapat dijadikan acuan atau dasar bagi Pemberi Waralaba ataupun Penerima Waralaba untuk melakukan tindakan hukum apabila salah satu pihak melanggar isi dari perjanjian. Dengan demikian diharapkan baik Pemberi Waralaba maupun Penerima Waralaba akan berusaha untuk mentaati setiap kesepakatan yang telah dituangkan ke dalam perjanjian waralaba dan iklim usaha waralaba dapat terjaga dan berjalan baik, dimana hal ini dapat mendorong kondisi perekonomian nasional menjadi lebih baik.




Said, Sudiro & Partners
Indonesian Legal Consultants
Sampoerna Strategic Square
South Tower, Level 18th
Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav. 45 - 46
Jakarta 12930 Indonesia

Phone : (62-21) 575.0983
Fax : (62-21) 575.0803

Websites : www.ssplegal.com
                 www.saidsudiro.webs.com
                 www.saidsudiro.weebly.com

Emails : mail@ssplegal.com
                sdsdp@cbn.net.id

P.O. BOX 8211 JKS.SB
Jakarta 12920
www.saidsudiro.weebly.com

Dalam Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan No. 31 Tahun 2008 tentang Penyelenggaraan Waralaba (“Permen 31”) terdapat ketentuan yang sebelumnya tidak diatur dalam aturan yang lama, yaitu mengenai keharusan Pemberi Waralaba untuk menyampaikan perjanjian waralaba kepada calon Penerima Waralaba paling lambat dua minggu sebelum penandatanganan perjanjian.

Tenggang waktu antara saat penyampaian perjanjian waralaba dan saat penandatanganan diharapkan cukup memberikan kesempatan kepada calon Penerima Waralaba untuk memahami, mengerti dan mencermati isi dari perjanjian waralaba. Selama jangka waktu sedikitnya dua minggu tersebut, calon Penerima Waralaba dapat mendiskusikan kembali isi perjanjian kepada Pemberi Waralaba untuk mencapai kata sepakat.

Meskipun tidak dijelaskan konsekuensi hukumnya apabila tenggang waktu yang disyaratkan dalam Permen 31 tidak diperhatikan, dapat disimpulkan bahwa penandatanganan perjanjian yang dilakukan tanpa persiapan matang atau tanpa cukup waktu untuk mempelajari isinya secara menyeluruh, dapat menjadi pemicu perselisihan terutama yang berkaitan dengan hak dan kewajiban para pihak dalam perjanjian.



Said, Sudiro & Partners
Indonesian Legal Consultants
Sampoerna Strategic Square
South Tower, Level 18th
Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav. 45 - 46
Jakarta 12930 Indonesia

Phone : (62-21) 575.0983
Fax : (62-21) 575.0803

Websites : www.ssplegal.com
                 www.saidsudiro.webs.com 
                 www.saidsudiro.weebly.com

Emails : mail@ssplegal.com
                sdsdp@cbn.net.id

P.O. BOX 8211 JKS.SB
Jakarta 12920

Selasa, 11 November 2008

www.saidsudiro.webs.com



Salah satu ketentuan baru yang harus diperhatikan oleh calon Pmeberi Waralaba dan calon Penerima Waralaba adalah mengenai syarat tenggat waktu penyampaian perjanjian waralaba sebelum penandatanganan perjanjian, sebagaimana diatur dalam Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan No. 31 Tahun 2008 tentang Penyelenggaraan Waralaba.

Menurut Pasal 5 ayat (3) Peraturan Menteri No. 31, perjanjian waralaba harus disampaikan kepada calon Penerima Waralaba selambat-lambatnya 2 (dua) minggu sebelum penandatanganan perjanjian.

Hal positif dari syarat tenggat waktu adalah mendukung Pemberi Waralaba untuk lebih berhati – hati dalam mempersiapkan perjanjian, karena perjanjian tidak dapat diseragamkan untuk setiap Penerima Waralaba. Setiap pembuatan perjanjian waralaba memerlukan pemikiran dan pertimbangan yang dalam, bergantung pada rencana tempat usaha, jangka waktu perjanjian, hak yang akan diberikan kepada Penerima Waralaba, kewajiban – kewajiban yang harus dipenuhi oleh Penerima Waralaba dan faktor – faktor lain yang dapat mempengaruhi jalannya bisnis waralaba tersebut.

Demikian pula bagi Penerima Waralaba, adanya syarat tenggat waktu memberikan waktu dan kesempatan kepada calon Penerima Waralaba untuk mempertimbangkan kalkulasi bisnis dan prospek usaha waralaba tersebut, mendiskusikan dan menegosiasikan dengan Pemberi Waralaba, sehingga diharapkan dapat mengurangi potensi perselisihan dikemudian hari.





SAID, SUDIRO & PARTNERS LAW FIRM
Sampoerna Strategic Square
South Tower, 18th Fl.
Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav 45-46
Jakarta 12930 Indonesia

Tel: (62 21) 575 0983
Fax: (62 21) 5750803

Websites: www.ssplegal.com
                www.saidsudiro.webs.com
                www.saidsudiro.weebly.com

Emails: mail@ssplegal.com
               sdsdp@cbn.net.id